Malviya et al. Res. Trends Int. J. Technol. Innov., October - December 2026, 1 (4) : 10-17
1Department of Information Technology, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India; 2Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
Article History
Accepted : 25 Jul 2026
Published : 05 Oct 2026
Publication Issue
Volume 1, Issue 4
October - December 2026
Page Number10–17
Rule-based threshold monitoring on production lines cannot identify previously unseen fault patterns, motivating unsupervised anomaly detection trained only on normal operating data. This paper trains a deep autoencoder on benign production-line sensor features from a multi-station assembly dataset and flags high reconstruction-error readings as anomalous, benchmarked against isolation forest and one-class SVM baselines. The autoencoder achieved an F1-score of 0.93 for detecting held-out fault conditions never seen during training, compared with 0.85 for isolation forest and 0.81 for one-class SVM.
Keywords - anomaly detection, industrial sensor data, autoencoder, unsupervised learning, predictive maintenance
Novel and compound fault variants routinely evade threshold-based production-line monitoring systems, motivating unsupervised approaches that learn a model of normal operating behaviour and flag deviations, without requiring labelled examples of every fault category in advance.
A five-layer deep autoencoder was trained exclusively on benign sensor records from a multi-station assembly-line dataset, using 78 statistical sensor features per record, with the reconstruction error threshold calibrated on a validation split of normal operation to achieve a target 1 percent false-alarm rate, then evaluated on a held-out test set containing five previously unseen fault categories including bearing wear and misalignment.
The autoencoder achieved an F1-score of 0.93 across the five held-out fault categories at the calibrated threshold, compared with 0.85 for an isolation forest baseline and 0.81 for a one-class SVM baseline trained on the identical feature set, with the largest relative advantage observed for slow-onset degradation patterns that departed only subtly from normal operating statistics.
Autoencoder-based reconstruction error provides a more sensitive unsupervised anomaly signal than tree-based or kernel baselines for detecting previously unseen production-line fault patterns. Future work will evaluate detection latency and threshold drift under live production conditions.
[1] Sakurada M. and Yairi T., Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction, MLSDA Workshop, 2014. [2] Lee J. et al., Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems: Reviews, methodology and applications, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2014.
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IJEIA Editorial Office. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Chirag Malviya, Esha Thakur (2026). Autoencoder-Based Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Industrial Production Line Sensor Data. IJEIA, 1(4), 10-17.
Aniket Ghosh, Sneha Vaidya
Industrial EngineeringFarhan Ahmed Qureshi, Neha Bansal